Business programme
30.06.2022
16:30–18:00

How to Lower Regulation Burden: Calculate the Execution Costs or Structure Them?

Congress Centre, conference hall B1
Control, Oversight and Regulation
Broadcast
Almost one and a half years have passed since the completion of the ‘regulatory guillotine’. Such a comprehensive legislative reform took place for the first time in Russian history and was completed on a rather tight deadline. As part of this work, it was possible to revise mandatory requirements, systematize them, and get rid of the redundant ones. Now comes the time to revise the requirements based on an assessment of the compliance costs. The Moscow government assessed a number of mass mandatory requirements and prepared proposals for their abolition or mitigation in order to create a favourable business environment. The issue of assessing the costs of compliance with mandatory requirements becomes particularly relevant in the context of providing businesses with maximum freedom in order to overcome economic instability and solve import substitution problems. Reducing the regulatory burden can provide entrepreneurs with savings that can be used for investment purposes. Another way to reduce costs is to systematize mandatory requirements, creating registers and catalogues of requirements. On the one hand this will allow to create information systems based on those registers; on the other hand, it would allow in-depth analytics on the frequency of checking requirements and on their actual implementation. This task is complicated by the fact that mandatory requirements are enshrined in legislation in a hierarchical manner, i.e. each subsequent normative act specifies, discloses and describes this or that requirement in greater detail. To what extent are requirements and permitting regimes are a barrier to business creation/scaling? Which mandatory requirements remain the most problematic from the perspective of entrepreneurs? At what level should mandatory requirements be fixed? And what should the regulatory structure look like? What can or should be contained in departmental acts of regulatory bodies?

Moderator

Alexey Bobrovsky

Panellists

Svetlana Alekseeva
Deputy Head, Head of Digital Transformation, Federal Service for Veterinary and Phytosanitary Supervision (Rosselkhoznadzor)
Alice Bezrodnaya
Deputy Minister of Justice of Russian Federation
Andrey Guryanov
General Director, League of Waste Paper Processors; Director for Interaction with Federal Executive Authorities, PTsBK Group of Companies
Evgeny Danchikov
Minister of the Government of Moscow, Head of the Main Control Department of the City of Moscow
Andrey Kashanin
Deputy Director, Institute of State and Municipal Administration, Higher School of Economics
Dmitry Petrovichev
Vice President, All-Russian Non-Governmental Organization of Small and Medium-Sized Businesses OPORA RUSSIA; Managing Director of the Bureau for the Protection of the Rights of Entrepreneurs and Investors
Vladimir Pligin
Co-Chairman, Association of Lawyers of Russia; Honored Lawyer of the Russian Federation
Mikhail Romanov
First Deputy Chairman of the Committee of the State Duma of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation on the Control
Dmitry Timofeev
Vice President for Government Relations and Corporate Relations, PJSC "PIK-Specialized Homebuilder"
Alexey Khersontsev
State Secretary – Deputy Minister of Economic Development of the Russian Federation

Front row participant

Ekaterina Avdeeva
Head of the Expert Center for Criminal Law Policy and Enforcement of Judicial Acts, All-Russia Public Organization Delovaya Rossiya (Business Russia)

Broadcast

<